CONELOG PROGRESSIVE implants

Design features

• Flexible solutions — Full range of prosthetic components serving all prosthetic indications and treatment concepts.
• Digital workflow — From planning to guided surgery and prosthetic restoration.
• Integrated platform-switching.
• Tapered body with buttress thread design and coronal anchoring thread for primary stability.
• Diameter-reduced implants (ø 3.3mm) and a short implant length (7mm) extend the range of indications.
• Promote surface — Predictable, long-term success; outstanding clinical long-term results; and comprehensive scientific documentation.

Why the CONELOG connection?

• Long conus for reduced micromovements.[1]
• Superior positional stability in comparison to other conical systems.[2,3]
• Easy positioning with tactile feedback.
• Integrated platform-switching.
• “Vertical fit feature” designed to minimize vertical discrepancy during workflow.

Guided kit features

• Simplify your surgical workflow with color-coded, keyless drills to minimize instrument use.
• Choose from a wide range of treatment planning options. Open architecture software from BioHorizons integrates with most 3-D treatment planning applications.
• Provide predictable, efficient surgery with fully guided protocol from BioHorizons.

Learn more about how CONELOG PROGRESSIVE strengthens the already-comprehensive line of BioHorizons dental implant solutions by visiting biohorizons.com/products/conelogprogressive.

References

1. Hogg WS, Zulauf K, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. The Influence of Torque Tightening on the Position Stability of the Abutment in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):538-541.
2. Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, Schaer A, Taylor T, Beuer F, Strietzel FP. Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. CAMLOG Foundation Consensus Report. Clin.Oral Impl. Res. 2014; 25(11): 1301-1303.
3. Semper-Hogg, W, Kraft, S, Stiller, S et al. Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant–abutment connection Clin Oral Invest (2013) 17: 1017.