- Austria / Österreich
- Bosnia and Herzegovina / Босна и Херцеговина
- Bulgaria / България
- Croatia / Hrvatska
- Czech Republic & Slovakia / Česká republika & Slovensko
- France / France
- Germany / Deutschland
- Greece / ΕΛΛΑΔΑ
- Italy / Italia
- Netherlands / Nederland
- Nordic / Nordic
- Poland / Polska
- Portugal / Portugal
- Romania & Moldova / România & Moldova
- Slovenia / Slovenija
- Serbia & Montenegro / Србија и Црна Гора
- Spain / España
- Switzerland / Schweiz
- Turkey / Türkiye
- UK & Ireland / UK & Ireland
As a recent article on this website points out, there are some safety issues with hand-held X-ray units made in China and Korea, as well as elsewhere outside the USA. There are two sources of radiation from an X-ray system—leakage radiation from the X-ray tube and scattered radiation from the patient. The leakage radiation is minimised by placing highly absorbing material, such as lead, around the X-ray tube. The major issue with the hand-held X-ray units is the scattered radiation, that is X-rays that are scattered from the patient towards the operator.
In fact, about 20 to 30% of the X-rays are scattered from the patient towards the person holding the device.
The X-ray units from outside the USA, which are under FDA scrutiny, do not provide any protection from X-rays scattered from the patient. These systems look like a large camera that you hold with both hands. There is no shielding provided by these hand-held systems, that is the user’s hands are exposed to all of the X-rays scattered from the patient. Consequently, the user’s hands are going to receive a radiation dose that will probably exceed the radiation-protection limits for skin and extremities. Therefore, these units should not be hand-held.
We evaluated one hand-held X-ray unit manufactured in the USA (Nomad, Aribex Inc.) and compared staff doses with those for the same staff using conventional wall-mounted systems prior to acquiring the hand-held systems (Gray et al. 2012). This hand-held system uses a proprietary shielding material around the X-ray tube, resulting in leakage radiation levels that are virtually immeasurable. In addition, it has an integral leaded-acrylic shield that protects the user from radiation scattered from the patient.
The results of our study indicated that the users of the hand-held X-ray system received lower radiation doses than they did when they were using conventional wall-mounted systems.
Buyers should be beware that not all hand-held X-ray systems are created equal and not all of those being sold on the web have been reviewed by the FDA. Hand-held X-ray units should have sufficient shielding to minimise leakage radiation from the X-ray tube and an integral shield to protect from radiation scattered from the patient.
Fri. 26 April 2024
12:00 PM EST (New York)
How you can access data-driven decision making
Mon. 29 April 2024
12:30 PM EST (New York)
Root caries: The challenge in today’s cariology
Tue. 30 April 2024
1:00 PM EST (New York)
Neodent Discovery: Neoarch Guided Surgery—from simple to complex cases
Fri. 3 May 2024
1:00 PM EST (New York)
Osseointegration in extrēmus: Complex maxillofacial reconstruction & rehabilitation praeteritum, praesens et futurum
Tue. 7 May 2024
8:00 PM EST (New York)
You got this! Diagnosis and management of common oral lesions
Thu. 9 May 2024
8:00 PM EST (New York)
Empowering your restorative practice: A comprehensive guide to clear aligner integration and success
Mon. 13 May 2024
9:00 AM EST (New York)
To post a reply please login or register