Two independent studies have confirmed the effectiveness of the VibraJect Dental Needle Attachment to block the pain of dental injections. The first study by Fred Quarnstrom, DDS, et al. dealt with pain level comparisons resulting from usage of the Wand (Milestone Scientific) with those compared to usage of the VibraJect dental needle attachment.
The second study by Queens University statistically measured and compared the amount of pain reduction experienced by patients given block injections of local anesthesia using the VibraJect dental needle attachment with block injections given to subjects using conventional injection methods.
The following excerpt is from the first of these two studies by Quarnstrom.
“A study by Fred Quarnstrom (DDS, FASDA, FICD, FAGD, Diplomate, American Board of Dental Anesthesiology, Diplomate, National Board of Dental Anesthesiology), Sun Hee Bang-Pastore (DDS), Ruth Woldemicael (DMD) and David Chen (DDS) compared the VibraJect to a computer-controlled injection device to control pain for injection of local anesthesia.
“Nineteen injections were done with the Wand handpiece of the CompuDent system by Milestone Scientific and 17 with the VibraJect by VibraJect LLC. Twenty-four were maxillary infiltrations and 12 were mandibular blocks.
“Patients reported the level of pain for the needle piercing their tissue, the injection of solution and their overall evaluation of the injection. No difference was seen for piercing the tissue, injecting the solution or overall report of pain.”
This study’s conclusion stated: “This study tends to indicate there is little difference in the pain perceived by a dental patient when injected using the Vibraject as opposed to injecting with the Wand.”
The second study is from Queens University, Belfast, Ireland, and reveals the following findings.
The study was conducted on 400 patients and showed that VibraJect statistically reduced the amount of “pain from 4.6 to 1.7, which is a pain level never statistically achieved before VibraJect.”
According to the Queen’s University study:
Results: “Subjects receiving the conventional injection methods had a mean pain score of 4.6 (± 0.414) The VibraJect group had a mean pain score of 1.71 (±0.235) (P<0.05). Certain sites had larger decreases in the mean pain score using the VibraJect. These included the upper anterior segment infiltrations and lower right IDB injections.”
Conclusions: “The vibrating syringe attachment resulted in reduced pain levels on receiving intraoral injections.”
More information is available from ITL Dental.
Integrating the VibraJect dental needle accessory into one’s dental practice and including it as an integral part of an established injection protocol...
Identifying whether or not your patient’s tooth is truly hypersensitive vs. a session of dental anxiety may have been an illusive task a few years ...
ZUG, Switzerland: Dental company vVARDIS has secured financing of $35 million (€33.9 million*) to support its growth initiatives, including the ...
PITTSBURGH, US: A new US$17 million research initiative led by the University of Pittsburgh is set to revolutionise understanding and treatment of ...
ATLANTA, Ga., USA: Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have developed the latest version of the intraoral Tongue Drive System, which is ...
The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as, “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or ...
LEIPZIG, Germany: People who suffer from gum disease and also have a severe form of rheumatoid arthritis can lower the chronic pain by keeping their teeth ...
MINNEAPOLIS, US: Since the election of Donald Trump as US president in 2024, the question of water fluoridation in the country has become increasingly ...
The Association for Dental Safety (ADS) has opened registration for its 2026 Dental Infection Control Boot Camp. Boot Camp is an intensive course designed ...
ATLANTA, Ga., USA: During the 2018 Thomas P. Hinman Dental Meeting, Planmeca USA introduced a certification program designed to encourage dialogue between ...
Live webinar
Wed. 14 January 2026
12:00 PM EST (New York)
Dr. Théo Laplane, Dr. Robert Gottlander DDS
Live webinar
Fri. 16 January 2026
12:00 PM EST (New York)
Live webinar
Mon. 19 January 2026
1:00 PM EST (New York)
Philipp Kopp, Michael Seeber
Live webinar
Thu. 22 January 2026
9:00 AM EST (New York)
Prof. Judith Jones D.D.S; M.P.H., Prof. Kakuhiro Fukai D.D.S., Ph.D, Dr. Bathsheba (Bethy) Turton
Live webinar
Thu. 22 January 2026
2:00 PM EST (New York)
Dr. Nicola M. Grande DDS, PhD
Live webinar
Wed. 28 January 2026
8:00 AM EST (New York)
Live webinar
Wed. 28 January 2026
11:00 AM EST (New York)
Prof. Dr. Jan-Frederik Güth
To post a reply please login or register